The recent viral video showing an agent from Mexico’s National Migration Institute (INM) beating migrants on the “La Bestia” train is a graphic representation of an immigration policy that leans dangerously toward repression. Despite political pressures, both national and international, acts of violence against migrants are not only unacceptable, but are also punishable under Mexican law.
Militarization and immigration policy
Mexico has stepped up militarization of its northern and southern borders, deploying the National Guard in a bid to control irregular migration. This repressive tactic is influenced by bilateral meetings between Mexico and the United States, where the immigration issue is treated less as a human rights issue and more as a political tool.
Political repercussions in the United States
In the United States, migration has become a critical electoral issue, with 50% of voters considering migration management as a decisive factor in their voting decisions. Figures such as Donald Trump and Governor Greg Abbott have intensified anti-immigrant discourse, significantly influencing immigration policy and public perceptions.
Impact of bilateral meetings
Each meeting between the leaders of Mexico and the United States tends to coincide with a tightening of immigration policies. The focus shifts from human rights to the political arena, where migration becomes an electoral tool, especially relevant in the American political context.
Laws and responsibilities of the INM
Article 140 of the Migration Law clearly specifies the causes for which INM public servants can be sanctioned. Among these, the negligence in the management of immigration procedures, the improper use of immigration documentation, and crucially, violations of the human rights of migrants stand out. The latter are especially relevant in the context of the aforementioned incident, since any violation proven to the competent authority can result in severe sanctions such as the dismissal and disqualification of the public servants involved.
Impunity and lack of transparency
Despite the existence of these legal provisions, impunity remains a significant problem. The INM has not demonstrated transparency in its actions nor has it adequately reported on the measures taken against agents who violate the rights of migrants. This lack of action and clarity perpetuates a cycle of abuse and mistrust that undermines the integrity of the institution and its legal and moral obligations towards migrants.
Immediate responsibility
It is imperative that Mexican authorities, including the president and legislative bodies, respond urgently to this situation. They must ensure that the INM fulfills its duty to protect human rights and apply appropriate sanctions for any violation of these rights, as stipulated by law. The international community must also maintain its vigilance and pressure so that Mexico strengthens its migration policies in line with international human rights standards.
Perspectives for change
The documented incident of violence is not only a reflection of a poorly directed policy, but also of a structural failure in the implementation of the laws designed to regulate the actions of INM public servants. This case should not be seen as an isolated incident, but as a call to deeply review and reform the immigration policies and practices of the INM. Only through transparent, responsible and humanitarian management of migration will Mexico be able to adequately face the challenges that this reality imposes. It is essential that migration is treated not as a passing crisis, but as a permanent condition that requires comprehensive, fair and effective approaches.
